Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:43
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Who can get a COVID-19 vaccine this fall? Here’s what we know - OregonLive.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are hygiene habits that everyone should have?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Who writes and reads novels nowadays?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce spotted at wedding in Knoxville - WBIR
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
If Humans Become Extinct, This Is the Species That Will Take Over the Planet - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Bessent Emerging as a Contender to Succeed Fed’s Powell - Bloomberg
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.